We run a live search with you, end to end. Nothing is sent to candidates.
Book a demo (opens in a new tab)The word now covers a search box, a scheduling bot and a system that runs a whole hiring process. How to tell which one you are looking at.
An AI recruiting agent pursues a hiring outcome by choosing its own steps and reacting to results, stopping at defined human gates. This differs from an assistant, which only suggests and requires you to act, and from automation, which executes a fixed configured sequence. The practical test: if two runs of the same brief could never legitimately differ, it is automation rather than an agent.
In 2024 an AI recruiting tool meant a search box that understood a sentence. By 2026 the same phrase covers a scheduling bot, a chat widget, a screening product and a system that runs an entire hiring process, and buyers are expected to work out which one they are looking at from a homepage.
The distinction that actually matters is not how clever the model is. It is how much of the work happens without a person, and what happens at the points where a person is still required.
| What it does | How you can tell | |
|---|---|---|
| Assistant | Answers, drafts and suggests. You act on every output. | Nothing happens if you close the tab. |
| Automation | Executes a fixed sequence you configured. Same steps, same order, every time. | It cannot decide to do something different, only to stop. |
| Agent | Pursues an outcome. Chooses steps, reacts to what comes back, and stops at defined gates. | Two runs of the same brief can legitimately look different. |
Most products sold as agents are automations with a chat interface, which is not an insult. Automation is reliable and cheap and often the right purchase. It is only a problem when it is bought expecting judgement.
If two runs of the same brief could never differ, it is automation. That is fine. It is just not an agent.
The work that is high-volume, judgement-light and time-sensitive. Finding candidates against a described profile. Reaching out and following up on a schedule nobody keeps manually. Answering the same twenty questions at whatever hour they arrive. Running a structured screen consistently across forty people. Chasing an assessment.
None of that is the interesting part of recruiting. All of it is most of the hours.
Persuading a hesitant candidate. Telling a hiring manager their brief is unrealistic. Deciding which of two good finalists fits a team. Anything where the answer depends on context that lives in your company rather than in a profile.
A vendor who claims otherwise is describing a liability, and the honest ones name their limits without being asked.
Upload a job description and watch the pipeline run before you commit to anything.
Start for free
